Bonsai and the Slow Work

The Juniper in Question

I spend most of my days trying to get things done faster. Better systems, better tools, better workflows. That’s kind of my whole deal. So it’s a little funny that one of the things I look forward to most each week is tending to something that will take decades to finish.

I’ve been getting into bonsai. And the thing about bonsai is that the tree does not care about your timeline. You make a cut, and then you wait. Sometimes years. You wire a branch into position and check on it next year. There’s no keyboard shortcut for this.

I trimmed a juniper last fall that I won’t touch again until this summer. That’s the plan. Leave it alone and let it grow. If I get impatient and start fussing with it, I’ll set it back. The best thing I can do for that tree right now is nothing.

That’s a hard lesson for someone like me.

We live in a culture that treats speed as a virtue. Get more done. Ship faster. Optimize everything. And I’m not going to pretend I’m immune to that. I built a career on it. But bonsai has been teaching me that some of the most important work happens slowly. You can’t rush a root system. You can’t shortcut the way a trunk thickens over years of careful pruning.

I’ve been reading Cal Newport’s Slow Productivity lately (I went through the Shortform summary first, which is a great way to get the core argument quickly). Newport makes a case I keep coming back to: real productivity isn’t about doing more things faster. It’s about doing fewer things, working at a natural pace, and caring deeply about quality. His third principle, obsessing over quality, is basically the bonsai philosophy in business terms. You don’t rush the work that matters most.

Newport points out that many of the people we consider most productive across history, writers, scientists, artists, actually worked slowly by modern standards. They had long gaps between major works. They weren’t optimizing their daily throughput. They were protecting their ability to do the deep, patient work that produced something lasting.

That landed for me. Because when I’m standing at my bonsai bench with a pair of scissors and a tree that may outlive me, I’m not being productive in any measurable way. Nobody’s going to see a result for years. But I’m practicing something I think I need more of: the ability to stay with something without needing to see immediate progress.

It turns out the same patience that makes a good bonsai also makes better writing, better teaching, and better thinking. When I sit down to work on a field guide, the best sessions are the ones where I stop watching the clock and just stay with the material until it’s right. Not fast. Right.

I’m not saying throw out your task manager. But I’ve started asking myself a different question when I plan my week. Instead of “how much can I get done?”, I’m asking “what deserves slow work this week?” Usually, it’s one thing. And giving that one thing the bonsai treatment, patient attention without rushing to a result, has made the work better.

The tree doesn’t care about your schedule. And maybe that’s exactly the reminder I need sitting on my desk.

The Studio Display XDR’s Quiet $400 Haircut

Apple just dropped the price of the VESA-mount Studio Display XDR by $400. The standless version is now $2,899, down from $3,299. The stand version stays at $3,299.

That’s a big correction for a product that’s only been on the market for a few weeks. And it makes me curious about the internal conversations that led to it. Did the original pricing miss the mark? Were pre-order numbers lower than expected? Did someone at Apple realize that charging the same price for a monitor without a stand as one with a stand didn’t make a lot of sense?

Either way, if you are looking at the new monitor sans stand, it just got a bit more affordable.

A Birthday, Not a Victory Lap

Apple turned 50 today. If you haven’t seen it yet, there’s a fun animated history running on Apple’s homepage that sketches its way through five decades of products. It’s clever but not too clever. If you’ve been around through Apple’s triumphs and failures, it’s a good watch.

I’m glad Apple is marking the occasion. Fifty years is a real milestone, and the company has earned a moment to look back. The Apple II. The Mac. The near-death experience. The iPod, the iPhone, and everything that followed. That’s a story worth reflecting on.

But I hope they don’t overdo it.

The reason I became an Apple customer wasn’t nostalgia. It was the opposite. Apple’s thing has always been an unrelenting focus on what’s next. What’s the best product we can make right now? What problem can we solve tomorrow? That restlessness is what made them interesting and what kept me buying their stuff year after year.

A 50th birthday celebration is great. A 50th birthday year where every keynote opens with a sepia-toned montage? Less great. Apple is at its best when it’s building the future, not curating the past.

So happy birthday, Apple. Now get back to work.

March in the MacSparky Labs

MacSparky Labs members get to participate in member events and receive a number of exclusive videos and podcasts each month. Here’s a summary of offerings this past month:

March 2026

  • 2026-03-27 – The Lab Report for March 27, 2026 (M,I,P) (Podcast)
  • 2026-03-25 – Sparky’s Robot Sample (I,P,M) (Video)
  • 2026-03-24 – The J-K-L Window Trick: Keyboard Maestro on Two Displays (I,P) (Video)
  • 2026-03-20 – Running Your Robot From Bed (M,I,P) (Video)
  • 2026-03-20 – The Lab Report for March 20, 2026 (M,I,P) (Podcast)
  • 2026-03-19 – 2026 Q1 Q&A (I,P,M) (Video)
  • 2026-03-19 – March Deep Dive – Sparky’s Robot Assistant (Media Release) (P) (Video)
  • 2026-03-17 – Exploring Bloom, An Interesting Finder Alternative (I,P) (Video)
  • 2026-03-13 – The Lab Report for March 13, 2026 (M,I,P) (Podcast)
  • 2026-03-12 – March Deep Dive – Sparky’s Robot Assistant (Event) (P) (Event)
  • 2026-03-12 – Going Deeper with SuperWhisper (M,I,P) (Video)
  • 2026-03-11 – Labs March Meetup (Media Release) (I,P) (Post)
  • 2026-03-10 – Testing Acme Weather (I,P) (Video)
  • 2026-03-07 – The March Labs Meetup Summary (I,P) (Post)
  • 2026-03-06 – Lab Report 2026-03-06 (M,I,P) (Podcast)
  • 2026-03-05 – Book Club: Intentional (Podcast) (M,I,P) (Podcast)
  • 2026-03-04 – Labs March Meetup (Event) (I,P) (Event)
  • 2026-03-03 – Stephen Millard’s Stream Deck Plugin (I,P) (Video)

Labs content and its membership level: P – Pathfinder; I – Insider; M – Member

If you’d like to be a part of the MacSparky Labs, you can get more information and join right here.

The Supportive Podcast Appearance

I was a guest on The Supportive, a podcast from Help Scout hosted by Mat Patterson. The episode is about customer support, small business, and figuring out what matters when you’re a one-person operation.

When Mat first reached out, I wasn’t sure an interview made sense. What I do is small. I make video tutorials and run a website. I’m not managing a support team or fielding thousands of tickets a day. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized I actually care a lot about customer support. Maybe more than I’d admitted to myself.

We ended up going deep on some things I don’t usually talk about in public. My early days working at RadioShack. The values my dad taught me over lunch when I told him I wanted to be a lawyer. Why I chose a small law firm over the big ones. And how all of that shaped the way I run MacSparky today.

The part of the conversation I keep coming back to is about kindness as a business strategy. Not in a soft, abstract way. In a practical way. If you solve for kindness in your customer interactions, you end up attracting the kind of audience you want. The aggressive people filter themselves out. That’s been my experience for twenty years now.

We also talked about the tension between growth and staying hands-on. Mat did a great job of getting me to talk about things I don’t usually discuss.

Mac Power Users 842: Feedback

On this episode of Mac Power Users, Stephen and I dig into the feedback bag. We cover everything from Stephen’s secret Cloudflare image-hosting shortcut to the great Raycast vs. Spotlight vs. Alfred debate, Stream Deck setups (and whether that new XL is too much Stream Deck), iCloud security with Advanced Data Protection, and how I’m using Keyboard Maestro conflict palettes for window management across two monitors. We also announce something new for More Power Users subscribers: monthly bonus episodes starting with a Star Wars movie ranking that may test our friendship.

Episode Links

The Paint at 7AM

Plenty of companies make money. Fewer make things people love. I’ve been thinking about that gap lately, and I think it starts at the top. Does the CEO actually care about the product? Not the quarterly numbers. Not the stock price. The product itself.

Walt’s Shadow

Walt Disney didn’t build Disneyland because he thought it would be a good investment. Everyone around him told him it would fail. His board of directors was against it. The banks wouldn’t fund it. So Walt cashed in his life insurance policy and mortgaged his house. He did it because he had two daughters and he wanted a place where he could take them and they could all have a good time together. That was the whole pitch. A dad who wanted to take his kids somewhere fun.

Once Disneyland opened, Walt was there constantly. He drove the train on Saturdays. He walked the park. He noticed details.

Back in the 80s, I worked at Disneyland. There was an old-timer painter on the crew, and he used to tell me how he’d be working first thing in the morning and feel someone’s shadow fall across him. He’d look up and there was Walt, making the rounds, checking on everything. Seeing the thing he’d built and making sure it was right.

That story has stuck with me for decades. Walt wasn’t checking a spreadsheet or reading a report from a middle manager. He was standing over a painter at 7 AM because the paint mattered to him.

Lasers

Steve Jobs was the same way, but louder about it.

The Apple stories are legendary by now, but the ones that stick with me are the ones from people I actually know. A friend of mine who worked at Apple told me about seeing Steve in the elevator after the MobileMe launch. MobileMe was supposed to be Apple’s big cloud services play, and it was a disaster. My friend said Steve looked like he had lasers shooting out of his eyeballs. The product had Apple’s name on it, and it was broken, and that ate him alive.

You could argue that’s unhealthy. Maybe it is. But there’s something about a CEO who feels physical pain when the product falls short. That energy flows downhill. When the person at the top cares that much, everyone else figures out pretty quickly that they’d better care too.

The Leather Jacket

I see that same energy today in Jensen Huang at NVIDIA. The guy shows up to every keynote in the same leather jacket, and he talks about chips the way a woodworker describes the grain of a piece of walnut. You can tell he’s not performingenthusiasm. He’s genuinely obsessed.

NVIDIA could coast right now. They’re printing money. But Jensen keeps pushing, keeps showing up with that look on his face like he can’t wait to show you what they built. He still holds weekly meetings with engineers.

The Test

You can spot it pretty easily. When a CEO talks about their company, do they talk about the product or the business? Walt talked about the park. Steve talked about the iPhone. Jensen talks about the chip. The ones who love the product can’t help themselves. The ones who don’t talk about market share and strategic initiatives.

There’s a difference between a company that makes money and a company that makes something worth caring about. I believe it starts with whether the person at the top loves what they’re building. As a thing they poured themselves into, not a line on a balance sheet.

I try to pull this lesson into my own work. Sparky Media is a small company. It’s just me with a little help. But I only pursue products I’m passionate about. Before I start a new field guide or take on a new project, I ask myself whether I care enough to put my name on it. If the answer isn’t an immediate yes, I don’t make it. I’d rather publish less and mean it than fill a catalog.

I’m not building theme parks or GPUs. But I know what it feels like to care about the paint at 7 AM.

The Demise of the Mac Pro

Yesterday Apple confirmed to 9to5Mac that the Mac Pro is officially discontinued. I don’t think anybody who’s been paying attention to this can be surprised. The writing was on the wall with the last Mac Pro update, which was twice the price and just slightly better than the then released Mac Studio M2 Ultra.

In the early, heady days of Apple Silicon and the M1 chip, there was a rumor that there was an even more powerful chip in the works, something along the lines of twice as powerful as the Ultra chips going into the high-end Mac Studio. That never came to fruition. In the intervening years, we’ve heard that chip still may come out, but in a future iteration of the M-series chips.

In my mind, the cancellation of the Mac Pro means that they’ve just given up on that. The most powerful Mac you’re going to be able to buy in the foreseeable future will be the upper-end Mac Studio.

The MacBook Neo’s Unfair Advantage

Steven Sinofsky, who ran the Windows division at Microsoft, picked up a MacBook Neo on launch day and wrote a long, reflective piece about it on his Substack. He called it “a paradigm shifting computer”. Coming from the guy who shipped Windows 8 and Surface, that’s not faint praise.

MKBHD went further in his review, calling the Neo “potentially Apple’s most disruptive product in the last 10+ years.” He said it should make the entire Windows and Chromebook laptop industry nervous. I think he’s right, but maybe not for the reasons most people are talking about.

Everyone’s focused on the specs. The A18 Pro chip. The $599 price. The aluminum build. Those are all real, and they all matter. But I think the deeper story is structural, and it’s one that PC makers can’t fix with a better chip or a thinner bezel.

Think about what it takes to build and sell a $599 PC laptop. You’ve got Microsoft, who needs to get paid for Windows. You’ve got the chip maker, whether that’s Intel, AMD, or Qualcomm. You’ve got the hardware manufacturer, Dell or HP or Lenovo. And you’ve got the retail channel. Every one of those companies needs their cut. Every one of them has shareholders and quarterly targets and sales teams and marketing budgets. By the time the laptop reaches a customer at $599, the margins have been carved up so many times there’s barely anything left to put toward making the actual product better.

Apple doesn’t have that problem. They make the chip. They write the operating system. They design the hardware. They sell it through their own stores and website. One company, one margin, one set of decisions. When Apple prices the Neo at $599, they’re not splitting that revenue four ways. They’re keeping it, and they get to decide exactly how much of it goes back into making the product great.

Moreover, I’m not sure Apple even cares that much about the profit margin on the Neo itself. Every $599 MacBook Neo that lands in a college student’s backpack is a new Apple customer. That person is going to buy apps, subscribe to iCloud, maybe pick up AirPods. A few years later they’ll upgrade to a MacBook Air or a Pro. Apple has always been good at the long game, and the Neo might be the longest game they’ve ever played. Get people into the Apple world at $599 and let the lifetime value take care of itself.

Sinofsky’s piece was interesting to me for another reason. He spent a lot of it reflecting on Windows 8 and Surface RT, which tried to do something similar with ARM chips back in 2012. He’s honest about what went wrong. The hardware and software were ready, he says. What they couldn’t pull off was moving developers to a new, more efficient app model fast enough. People wanted the old Windows. Microsoft’s greatest strength, running everything forever, turned out to be the thing that held them back.

Apple took the opposite approach. They spent twenty years systematically moving developers to new frameworks, sunsetting old APIs, and refusing to let backward compatibility become a prison. When they switched to Apple Silicon, the apps were ready. When the Neo shipped with an A18 Pro, nobody complained that their software didn’t work. That’s not an accident.

So yes, there will be PC laptops at the same price as the Neo. There already are. But there won’t be comparable PC laptops at the same price. That’s the distinction. You can match the price or you can match the experience, but the economics of the PC industry make it nearly impossible to do both at once. Apple can, because they’re the only company that controls the entire stack from silicon to storefront.

There is also another question here. If Microsoft’s legacy support kept them from going to the next thing, what is in Apple’s DNA prohibiting it from going to the next thing?

Focused 252: Donkey Work

On this episode of Focused, Mike and I dig into an idea we’re calling “donkey work.” It’s the stuff that has to get done but doesn’t require your best creative thinking. Invoicing, email triage, file management, scheduling. The question is whether AI assistants can take some of that off your plate. I just released the Robot Assistant Field Guide, and Mike’s been working through it, so we compare notes on how we’re each using tools like Claude and Obsidian to offload the operational grind. We also talk about where these tools fall short and why you still need to understand what you’re delegating before you hand it off to a robot.

Episode Links

This episode of Focused is sponsored by:

  • Gusto: Payroll, HR, Benefits. Simplified. Get 3 months free.
  • Incogni: Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code FOCUSED with this link and get 60% off an annual plan.